A little of subject but something of interest

[Jack & Donna Smith]

Several years ago, we spent a couple of months in The Netherlands.
Our car was a 626 Mazda "Dual Fuel". We drove it mostly to town and
within a 30 mile radius of the House. It ran on Gasoline and
"Auto-Gas", which I took to be Propane. A simple switch on the
dashboard selected the changeover. The LPG tank was in the trunk.
Usually, we drove to the train station, as this form of transportation
is so efficent, easy, and goes everywhere.
Jack Smith
SoCal

===============================================================

--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Henry Jay Hannigan"
wrote:
> --IN Australia most of the people use LPG in cars..much cheaper!! My
> old toyota is dual fuel; petrol and LPG just pull up to the pump
> and fill up with LPG..no big deal here we are way behind.
> later
> Hank Hannigan
> 90SP and lovin it!!!!
> - In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, Tom Warner
> wrote:
> > Jack I still remember the gas shortage scare of the 1970s when I
> was going
> > to college. Everyone forcasted the gloom and doom of the future
> and said we
> > would all be commuting on skate boards and bicycles powered by
> rubber
> > bands. Americans never learn. We went back to our old wasteful
> habits again
> > and the environmentalists put up a smoke screen that stopped
> development of
> > refineries etc. When will we every learn.
> >
> > I want a new Mercedes Diesel but nice old New York is thinking
> about
> > banning them. You already cannot get a VW passat diesel.
> >
> > tom
> > 1982 FC35
> > Vernon Center,NY
> >
> > At 01:56 PM 6/16/2005 +0000, you wrote:
> > >Yeah Blair, I got the book you recommended, "The Long Emergency"
> and
> > >just started reading it.
> > >It will be a fight to get people into electric cars! Remember
> about
> > >10 or 15 years ago, GM(?) brought one out, and the Feds said that
> by
> > >the year 2005, 25% of the cars on the road would be electric?
> Where
> > >are they??????
> > >Nuclear Power? I think that France, Switzerland Japan, and other
> > >countrys also, use it almost 100%. Difference there is that they
> have
> > >a "Standard" plant, almost like buying one 'Off The Shelf' at
> WalMart.
> > > Here, each and every plant was designed and built from the
> ground up,
> > >and everything had to be tested, re-tested & approved by the NRC.
> > >The Greenies have done so well with thier scare tactics that no
> > >nuclear can be built in the future.
> > >Refinerys? Wern't quite a few closed in the Houston area a
> number of
> > >years ago?? Why can't they be reopened?
> > >But that would not help California much, as we have standards that
> > >require our Gasoline to be refined here with certian additives,
> so we
> > >cannot import or export any of our gas.
> > >Jack Smith
> > >1973FC31
> > >SoCal
> > >============================================================
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, Blair
> wrote:
> > > > Well, that's a yes and a no.....please read the following,
> Blair
> > > >
> > > > "Boone Pickens Warns of Petroleum Production Peak
> > > >
> > > > >Legendary Oklahoma energy magnate, T. Boone Pickens will be 77
> > >years old
> > > > >
> > > > >this month, and maybe because of that, he feels free to speak
> what's on
> > > > >his
> > > > >mind; and he did to an audience of alternative fuel advocates
> in Palm
> > > > >Springs today.
> > > > >
> > > > >Addressing the 11th National Clean Cities conference, hosted
> by the
> > > > >former
> > > > >mayor of Palm Springs and introduced by former U.S. Energy
> Secretary
> > > > >John
> > > > >Herrington (1984-1989), Boone, as his friends refer to him,
> was candid
> > > > >in
> > > > >his views of wind energy, nuclear power, natural gas, and in
> particular
> > > > >petroleum.
> > > > >
> > > > >While he acknowledges wind power is cheap today, he, as well
> as
> > > > >former-Secretary Herrington, questioned the contribution it
> can make to
> > > > >the
> > > > >nation's future energy needs. He finds nuclear power
> attractive and
> > > > >believes natural gas should be used to power our
> transportation fleets
> > > > >rather than to generate electricity. In general, he was very
> upbeat
> > > > >about
> > > > >the prospects for alternative transportation fuels.
> > > > >
> > > > >But on the future of petroleum, he was less sanguine.
> > > > >
> > > > >"Let me tell you some facts the way I see it," he
> began. "Global oil
> > > > >(production) is 84 million barrels (a day). I don't believe
> you can get
> > > > >it
> > > > >any more than 84 million barrels. I don't care what (Saudi
> Crown
> > >Prince)
> > > > >
> > > > >Abdullah, (Russian Premier Vladimir) Putin or anybody else
> says about
> > > > >oil
> > > > >reserves or production. I think they are on decline in the
> biggest oil
> > > > >fields in the world today and I know what's it like once you
> turn the
> > > > >corner and start declining, it's a tread mill that you just
> can't keep
> > > > >up
> > > > >with.
> > > > >
> > > > >"So, when you start adding the reserves in these countries,
> you're not
> > > > >even
> > > > >replacing what you're taking out.
> > > > >
> > > > >"Let me take you to another situation quickly. 84 million
> barrels a day
> > > > >times 365 days is 30 billion barrels of oil a year that we're
> > >depleting.
> > > > >
> > > > >All of the world's (oil) industry doesn't even come close to
> replacing
> > > > >30
> > > > >billion barrels of oil. We don't spend enough money to even
> give
> > > > >ourselves
> > > > >a chance to replace 30 billion barrels. It may be because the
> prospects
> > > > >are
> > > > >not there. I rather imagine that's what the answer is to that.
> > > > >
> > > > >"So, if you accept that 84 million barrels a day is all the
> world can
> > > > >(produce), and then look at refining capacity, I think it's
> just a
> > > > >coincidence that refining capacity... world capacity... is 84
> million
> > > > >barrels a day. So, we're in balance: 84, 84.
> > > > >
> > > > >"Now you see the projections for the fourth quarter of '05, I
> mean like
> > > > >tomorrow; it is 86 to 87 million barrels of oil a day
> required. China
> > > > >(and)
> > > > >India (are) growing fast. Our economy is going down a little
> bit,
> > >but it
> > > > >
> > > > >doesn't seem to be shutting off demand for gasoline, oil,
> natural gas,
> > > > >whatever. But around the world... just assume that the (U.S.)
> > >economy is
> > > > >
> > > > >slowing, but China is still ramped up; it is still 86, 87
> million for
> > > > >the
> > > > >fourth quarter.
> > > > >
> > > > >"Now we've got some pretty good inventory, those will be... I
> think..
> > > > >they'll be gone in the third quarter. I can't wait to see how
> this is
> > > > >all
> > > > >going to play out.
> > > > >
> > > > >"Don't let the day-to-day NYMEX (New York Mercantile
> Exchange) fool
> > >you,
> > > > >
> > > > >because it can turn and go the other direction. I may be
> wrong. Some of
> > > > >the
> > > > >experts say we'll be down to $35 oil by the end of the year.
> I think
> > > > >it'll
> > > > >be $60 oil by the end of the year. You're going to see $3
> gasoline
> > > > >twelve
> > > > >months from today, or some time during that period. I know
> you've
> > > > >already
> > > > >experienced it in California. I am not that much out of it...
> But
> > >in the
> > > > >
> > > > >Midwest you've probably got $2.20 today. That's the way I see
> it
> > > > >unfolding".
> > > > >
> > > > >Pickens went to explain that if he were Energy "Czar", he'd
> immediately
> > > > >begin to phase out the use of natural gas in electric power
> generation
> > > > >and
> > > > >encourage the construction of more coal-fired and nuclear
> power plants.
> > > > >He'd use the natural gas to power transportation instead.
> > > > >
> > > > >Speaking of the various alternative fuels, he stated, "I don't
> > >think any
> > > > >of
> > > > >them can miss. I think some will be further out than others.
> > >Hydrogen, I
> > > > >
> > > > >think, is going to take a long time". Speaking before an
> audience with
> > > > >vested interests in ethanol, biodiesel, propane and
> compressed natural
> > > > >gas
> > > > >as transportation fuels, he added that he believes all the
> alternatives
> > > > >will work.
> > > > >
> > > > >"We're going to have to use shale oil the western slope of
> the Rockies.
> > > > >That's going to happen. The technology is just about here",
> he noted,
> > > > >adding that he blames both Republican and Democratic
> > >administrations for
> > > > >
> > > > >not engaging in long term planning to meet the nation's
> future energy
> > > > >needs.
> > > > >
> > > > >"It's all getting very, very tight. We're just about there.
> The sixty
> > > > >percent we import now (of petroleum), is about all we can get
> from the
> > > > >countries that export". He cited the example of Venezuela
> where its
> > > > >"screwball" leader, Hugo Chavez has pledged to not sell any
> additional
> > > > >oil
> > > > >to the United States.
> > > > >
> > > > >"The majors, they talk about plenty of oil and that they can
> produce
> > > > >more,
> > > > >but if you look at ExxonMobile, ChevronTexaco, BP (British
> Petroleum),
> > > > >all
> > > > >the production (is) going down every year. They don't replace
> and they
> > > > >don't add to production, but they say there's plenty of oil
> around.
> > > > >
> > > > >"Now why would they say that? One of the chief economists
> with one of
> > > > >the
> > > > >major oil companies... I was at a conference where he was...
> we were
> > > > >talking and I asked, why do they say that? And he said, can
> you imagine
> > > > >what would happen if one of these major oil company's CEO's
> got up and
> > > > >made
> > > > >a speech and he said, 'We're running out of oil'? I said
> there'd be
> > > > >panic
> > > > >and he said, 'That's right. They're not going to make the
> statement.
> > > > >They're going to say there's plenty of oil around'".
> > > > >
> > > > >"I know that sounds rather simple, but that's the best answer
> I've
> > > > >had...
> > > > >why they keep saying that there's plenty of oil around. I
> can't
> > >tell you
> > > > >
> > > > >positive, but I am just so sure that we have peaked and from
> here
> > >on the
> > > > >
> > > > >demand side that we are going to have a hard time making the
> trip on
> > > > >fuel.
> > > > >I know demand will come down with price. That will happen".
> > > > >
> > > > >He answered several audience questions and predicted that if
> the summer
> > > > >is
> > > > >hot in the Southeast that natural gas prices will go to
> $10. "Natural
> > > > >gas
> > > > >is in decline", he stated, concluding that eventually the
> market will
> > > > >sort
> > > > >out the winners and losers".
> > > > >
> > > > >After his remarks, EV World asked Mr. Pickens if he agrees
> with
> > > > >Houston-based investment banker Matthew Simmons that Saudi
> Arabia's oil
> > > > >fields may be on the verge of decline and he replied that he
> did agree
> > > > >him.
> > > > >
> > > > >If Pickens and Simmons are correct, then Crown Prince
> Abdullah's
> > > > >promises
> > > > >to raise production over the next ten years to 15 million
> barrels a day
> > > > >may
> > > > >be just wishful thinking, in which case, Saudi Arabia's role
> as swing
> > > > >producer and oil price stabilizer may be a thing of the past.
> Oil
> > >prices
> > > > >
> > > > >will begin to experience unprecedented volatility, which is
> likely to
> > > > >place
> > > > >serious stresses on a world largely unprepared for the end of
> cheap
> > > > >fossil
> > > > >fuels. The road from here on will be a bumpy one."
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > At 04:40 AM 6/16/2005, you wrote:
> > > > >mikes got it right..randy
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Mike Hohnstein
> > > > > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 7:27 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] A little of subject but
> > >something of
> > > > > interest
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > That's all good but the real problem is the lack of
> refining
> > >capacity
> > > > > in this country. The "not in my back yard" syndrome is the
> problem
> > > > > there, not to mention restrictive regulations meant to save
> the
> > >world or
> > > > > something.
> > > > > Mike Hohnstein
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: DAY8293A@C...
> > > > > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 11:53 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [WanderlodgeForum] A little of subject but
> > >something of
> > > > > interest
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 55 MAY BE GOOD FOR OUR COACHES, BUT THE BIG
> RIGS USE
> > > > > MORE FUEL
> > > > > GOING 55. I HAD A 4 SPEED CHEVY VEGA SET UP WITH A
> HIGHWAY
> > >SPEED
> > > > > (70 MPH)
> > > > > REAR END, AND WAS GETTING 30 MPG. MUCH MORE THAN WHEN I
> BOUGHT IT.
> > > > > WHEN PRESIDENT "JIMMAY" LOWERED THE SPEED LIMIT TO
> 55 MPH, I
> > > > > COULD NO
> > > > > LONGER MAKE IT UP HILLS IN FOURTH GEAR, AND HAD TO DOWN
> SHIFT TO
> > > > > THIRD,,, JUST
> > > > > LIKE THE BIG TRUCKS HAD TO DO,,, AND DOWN WENT MY FUEL
> MILEAGE !!!
> > > > > IT HELPS SOME VEHICLES TO GO SLOW, AND OTHERS CAN
> CRUISE
> > >AT HIGHER
> > > > > SPEEDS AND DO BETTER. I CAN GET 30 MPG IN MY CORVETTE
> AT 70
> > >MPH. (I
> > > > > USED TO GET
> > > > > 36 MPG IN MY 93 VETTE)
> > > > > I THINK PEOPLE WILL SLOW DOWN TO SAVE GAS IF IT
> WORKS FOR
> > >THEIR
> > > > > VEHICLE,,, I KNOW I SLOW DOWN,,, WE DON'T NEED THE GOV'T
> ON
> > >OUR CASE
> > > > > ANYMORE.
> > > > > WHAT WE DO NEED IS TO LIFT THE NICKLE A GALLON FUEL
> TAX
> > >THAT "SLICK
> > > > > WILLY" PUT ON FUEL WHEN HE WAS IN OFFICE,,,, DAY, IN JAX
> FLA
> > > > > ,,,,83PT-40,,,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >----------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > -----
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ><http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WanderlodgeForum/>http://groups.yahoo
> .com/
> > > group/WanderlodgeForum/
> > > > >
> > > > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > > WanderlodgeForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > > >
> > > > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> Terms of
> > > > > Service.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >----------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > -----
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ><http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WanderlodgeForum/>http://groups.yahoo
> .com/
> > > group/WanderlodgeForum/
> > > > >
> > > > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > > WanderlodgeForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > > >
> > > > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> Terms
> > >of Service.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >----------
> > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > > > > *
> > > > >
> >
> ><http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WanderlodgeForum/>http://groups.yahoo
> .com/group/WanderlodgeForum/
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > *
> > > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > > *
> > > > >
> > > > subject=Unsubscribe>WanderlodgeForum-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > *
> > > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> > > > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >