| 
				
				 
					315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight
				 
			 | 
		
| 
				 
					03-27-2009, 12:17 
				 
				
Post: #30 
			 | 
		|||
				
  | 
		|||
| 
				315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight 
				 
					That was what I figured. Any idea what your "other" brand would charge for a 
				
				
				
			good 315/80? On 3/27/2009 at 6:02 PM ronmarabito2002 wrote: >Don: They are 12R. > >R.E. (Ron) Marabito, Dallas, TX 92WB40 > >--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Don Bradner" >wrote: >> >> Ron, are those 12R, or 315/80? Usually a big difference in price between >the two sizes. >> >> On 3/27/2009 at 3:29 PM ronmarabito2002 wrote: >> >> >I personally run another brand at a price of less than $500. I have >done >> >this for 15 years and never had a tire failure that was not caused by a >> >road hazard. >> > > > > >------------------------------------ > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > >  | 
		|||
| 
				
	 
					« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
				 
			 | 
		
| Messages In This Thread | 
| 
 315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Don Bradner - 03-24-2009, 14:04 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Don Bradner - 03-24-2009, 16:25 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Fred Hulse - 03-24-2009, 16:47 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Fred Hulse - 03-24-2009, 17:41 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Don Bradner - 03-24-2009, 18:33 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Don Bradner - 03-25-2009, 04:46 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  davisgr - 03-25-2009, 05:59 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Don Bradner - 03-25-2009, 06:58 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Fred Hulse - 03-25-2009, 13:49 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Bob Lawrence - 03-25-2009, 14:02 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Don Bradner - 03-25-2009, 14:38 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  sfedeli3 - 03-26-2009, 01:17 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Bob Lawrence - 03-26-2009, 13:20 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  ronmarabito2002 - 03-26-2009, 13:26 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  birdshill123 - 03-26-2009, 14:29 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Steve Pfiffner - 03-26-2009, 14:48 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Pete Masterson - 03-26-2009, 15:19 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Don Bradner - 03-26-2009, 15:40 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  rogerwwebb@... - 03-26-2009, 20:16 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  birdshill123 - 03-27-2009, 04:07 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 04:29 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 04:31 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 04:37 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 05:21 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Don Bradner - 03-27-2009, 06:09 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 07:02 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Wayne Kotila - 03-27-2009, 07:20 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Pete Masterson - 03-27-2009, 08:33 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Kurt Horvath - 03-27-2009, 11:02 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Don Bradner - 03-27-2009 12:17 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Bob Lawrence - 03-27-2009, 12:27 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  David Brady - 03-27-2009, 14:44 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  David Brady - 03-27-2009, 14:46 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  ronmarabito2002 - 03-27-2009, 14:46 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Don Bradner - 03-28-2009, 05:11 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Jim Riordan - 04-01-2009, 14:23 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  ronmarabito2002 - 04-03-2009, 02:50 
315/80 vs 12R - was Overweight -  Don Bradner - 04-03-2009, 07:43 
 | 
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Link Directory
Wanderlodge Trader
Document Library
Calendar


![[+]](http://www.wanderlodgegurus.com/images/collapse_collapsed.gif)