Worth It To Upgrade To A Newer Wanderlodge???
|
05-21-2005, 03:35
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
Worth It To Upgrade To A Newer Wanderlodge???
Simple, Jon. You get a 42 ft. coach like mine then a 45. Don't know
what you do after that but they will probably be building them bigger in a few years... George Lowry '95 WBDA 4203 & GM 4106 (for sale) Spearfish, SD jon lechich wrote: > Jeff that was well written! Your write about the two foot thing and what happens when you get that big 40 ft coach in a few years you want another one. Human nature at work!Jon > > Jeff Miller inflicted financial pain on its > victims for longer than I've been around, it can affect boaters, > RVers, homeowners, ... its mutations are many. > > If you like the coach you have, keep it. If it doesn't suit your > needs, then you have justification to change up. Anything beyond that > is a simple matter of you can afford better and you want to do it. > You can't take the money with you, ... > > I've had most years/configurations of diesel FC, have my preferences. > Leaf springs, ride a little harsher and can't drop the coach for > leveling and ease of entry, but they are lighter and don't have the > air-leak problems (I'll be changing an air-bag tomorrow that leaks). > Turbos? I personally won't buy a non-turbo coach for example, kind of > like going back to B&W television once you've had color. I like the > safety of the retarder and the power with relatively clean exhaust of > the turbo coaches. The '87-'89 FC with the 300hp/5-speed is a whole > different driving experience again. > > There is no improvement made to the Wanderlodge in the '80s that I > can think of that isn't worth a little more money. When people ask me > what year/model they should buy, the first question I ask is the > budget. If someone wants to spend $30k and have a coach that is ready > to roll, with everything looking and working great, it'll be hard to > find even an early diesel in that condition for that price. If > spending mid-$40k range and not minding a few minor and cosmetic > issues with an original interior, definately a turbo FC. If you have > the money for an '88/'89 FC, go for it they are IMO by far the best > FC models made for driveability and floorplan as well as many other > refinements. Pretty much every year from '82-on had significant > changes, some even mid-year, on the FC and on the PT. Move to a nice > turbo coach and you'll never be able to go back, air leaks or not. > > We loved our '77, it served us well. It was simple and inexpensive to > operate, and most system failures could be dealt with using wire and > tape temporarily, ... a robust and charming coach. Then two-foot-itus > got me. > > - Jeff Miller > http://www.wanderlodge.net > http://www.millercoachworks.com > > > --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "dthollis1961" > > wrote: > >>I own a 78 FC33 that I've spent the last 1-1/2 years refurbing. > > It's > >>to the point now that most everything works and looks good too, but >>it >>is still a 1978 model with leaf springs, 210 hp and 5.29 gears. > > I'm > >>not smart, but I don't think it would be a good idea to try to make >>a '78 into an '87 or so. Maybe I should buy a newer one instead. >>I'm >>talking about a '87-'89 FC. >> >>My questions are to those that have moved up the Wanderlodge > > ladder. > >>Is an '87 FC with all its updates over a '78 really worth 2 or 3 >>times >>what a '78 FC is worth? I must be missing something. An '87 is >>still >>old, mine's just a little older. Was it worth it to you to move up? >> >>Just Wandering, >>David Hollis >>78 FC33 >>Springfield,IL > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > One of my favorite sayings goes! "You never own anything, everything owns you!" > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Mail Mobile > Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)