rwoodysurplus
12-16-2008, 16:14
yes sir..
we gotta try it for fun!
never say never they tell me!
too easy to change if we are wrong.
Thanks! for putting the thinking cap on to show me the reason why?
--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Don Bradner"
wrote:
>
> On 12/17/2008 at 3:32 AM rwoodysurplus wrote:
>
> >yes you are right--GOOD CATCH~!
> >
> >going to try that ...pushers suck air from the side
> >
> >why not the rear????
>
> Question: "why not the rear????"
>
> based on assumption: "pushers suck air from the side"
>
> Have you considered the (likely) possibility that the assumption is
wrong? At least in terms of meaningful airflow?
>
> What would that do to your question?
>
> Don Bradner
> 90 PT40 "Blue Thunder"
> Posting today by aircard from Needles, California
> My location: http://www.bbirdmaps.com/user2.cfm?user=1
>
we gotta try it for fun!
never say never they tell me!
too easy to change if we are wrong.
Thanks! for putting the thinking cap on to show me the reason why?
--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "Don Bradner"
>
> On 12/17/2008 at 3:32 AM rwoodysurplus wrote:
>
> >yes you are right--GOOD CATCH~!
> >
> >going to try that ...pushers suck air from the side
> >
> >why not the rear????
>
> Question: "why not the rear????"
>
> based on assumption: "pushers suck air from the side"
>
> Have you considered the (likely) possibility that the assumption is
wrong? At least in terms of meaningful airflow?
>
> What would that do to your question?
>
> Don Bradner
> 90 PT40 "Blue Thunder"
> Posting today by aircard from Needles, California
> My location: http://www.bbirdmaps.com/user2.cfm?user=1
>