orbitalsolutions
02-04-2006, 08:07
Hello, Fred. According to the Trojan Web Site the dimentions are
identical for the T-105 and the T-125. The T-145 is apx. 7/8 of an
inch taller with the same footprint.
I do not know what a Blue Point filler is. Sounds interesting
though. I fill my batteries with a baster and an eye droper. I get
the job done eventually, with minimum spilliage and believe I can do
the same with the taller T-145's in my '78 FC.
I still have not priced the T-145's, but they are a nice jump in
AH's, at 12VDC you can add a useable 70 AH's !!
-James
78FC33SB
LasVegas NV
--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "fred89sp"
wrote:
>
> I have T 125s (taller than the T 105s) in my 89SP and my Blue Point
> battery filler just fits.
>
> How do you top off your batteries with the added height of the T
145s,
> have you found a lower profile battery filler?
>
>
> --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, dspithaler@ wrote:
> >
> > Hi James I have four T-145's in my house compartment up front
&
> they work good for me. I have had them in for two years. Just make
> sure you have the room for the higher batteries in the compartment.
> They are in a 89 SP 36'. I had T-105's in my 79 FC that worked
good also.
> > Don 89 SP 36'
> > Butler, PA in Zephyrhills FL right now
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: orbitalsolutions
> > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 01:44:43 -0000
> > Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Trojan Batteries And Chargers
> >
> >
> >
> > I just finished looking at the Trojan Web Site. There are three
models
> > that I want to talk about -- T-105, T-125, T-145.
> >
> >
> >
> > These are all identical in dimensions with the only exception
being that
> > the T-145 is slightly less than an inch taller.
> >
> >
> >
> > Here are the 20hr rates -- T-105 = 225AH, T-125 = 240AH, T-145 =
260AH.
> >
> >
> >
> > The only other difference is their weight -- T-105 = 60lbs, T-
125 =
> > 66lbs, T-145 = 72lbs.
> >
> >
> >
> > Seems like the heavier models have larger plates and should have
> > greater durability, I suppose, more Amp Hours for sure. So I am
> > wondering why everyone uses the T-105's? Is there a problem with
using
> > the higher reated models?
> >
> >
> >
> > If any one has any input on a new charge/converter to replace the
> > original I would appreciate it. the original charger/converter
works
> > fine but I have been told that it will boil the batteries. In
fact, the
> > previous owner of my bus has a timer in line with the charger to
prevent
> > it from running full time when the bus is "pluged in." This
actually
> > works fine but I'm assuming that it is a one stage charger and
was
> > wondering if it would make sense to replace it with a modern 3
stage
> > job.
identical for the T-105 and the T-125. The T-145 is apx. 7/8 of an
inch taller with the same footprint.
I do not know what a Blue Point filler is. Sounds interesting
though. I fill my batteries with a baster and an eye droper. I get
the job done eventually, with minimum spilliage and believe I can do
the same with the taller T-145's in my '78 FC.
I still have not priced the T-145's, but they are a nice jump in
AH's, at 12VDC you can add a useable 70 AH's !!
-James
78FC33SB
LasVegas NV
--- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, "fred89sp"
wrote:
>
> I have T 125s (taller than the T 105s) in my 89SP and my Blue Point
> battery filler just fits.
>
> How do you top off your batteries with the added height of the T
145s,
> have you found a lower profile battery filler?
>
>
> --- In WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com, dspithaler@ wrote:
> >
> > Hi James I have four T-145's in my house compartment up front
&
> they work good for me. I have had them in for two years. Just make
> sure you have the room for the higher batteries in the compartment.
> They are in a 89 SP 36'. I had T-105's in my 79 FC that worked
good also.
> > Don 89 SP 36'
> > Butler, PA in Zephyrhills FL right now
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: orbitalsolutions
> > To: WanderlodgeForum@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 01:44:43 -0000
> > Subject: [WanderlodgeForum] Trojan Batteries And Chargers
> >
> >
> >
> > I just finished looking at the Trojan Web Site. There are three
models
> > that I want to talk about -- T-105, T-125, T-145.
> >
> >
> >
> > These are all identical in dimensions with the only exception
being that
> > the T-145 is slightly less than an inch taller.
> >
> >
> >
> > Here are the 20hr rates -- T-105 = 225AH, T-125 = 240AH, T-145 =
260AH.
> >
> >
> >
> > The only other difference is their weight -- T-105 = 60lbs, T-
125 =
> > 66lbs, T-145 = 72lbs.
> >
> >
> >
> > Seems like the heavier models have larger plates and should have
> > greater durability, I suppose, more Amp Hours for sure. So I am
> > wondering why everyone uses the T-105's? Is there a problem with
using
> > the higher reated models?
> >
> >
> >
> > If any one has any input on a new charge/converter to replace the
> > original I would appreciate it. the original charger/converter
works
> > fine but I have been told that it will boil the batteries. In
fact, the
> > previous owner of my bus has a timer in line with the charger to
prevent
> > it from running full time when the bus is "pluged in." This
actually
> > works fine but I'm assuming that it is a one stage charger and
was
> > wondering if it would make sense to replace it with a modern 3
stage
> > job.