04-08-2015, 12:05
04-08-2015, 19:24
Well... I've been screwing around with it. Let me know if it's any better!
04-08-2015, 21:07
It is on my end. Back to it's old self.
04-08-2015, 21:52
(04-08-2015 21:07)patticake Wrote: [ -> ]It is on my end. Back to it's old self.
Awesome Steve! Now I want to hear from Ernie, Al, and Ron.
04-08-2015, 23:52
Hey, this thread came right up twice, but the air leak tester thread only took 30 seconds ("waiting for http://www.wanderl...) Much better. Now useable. I'm a happy camper, so to speak. Thank you for whatever you did.
Well, I don't much know what this all means, but if it helps, here it is. That didn't copy very well. Is it useable?
Web Page Performance Test for
http://www.wanderlodgegurus.com
From: Miami, FL - Chrome - Cable
4/8/2015, 10:57:30 PM
Summary
DetailsPerformance ReviewContent BreakdownDomainsScreen Shot
Tester: ROUTERCON6-73.204.184.197
Raw page data - Raw object data
Export HTTP Archive (.har)
See in ShowSlow
View Test Log
Document Complete Fully Loaded
Load Time First Byte Start Render Speed Index DOM Elements Time Requests Bytes In Time Requests Bytes In Cost
First View 3.316s 0.690s 3.328s 3343 1635 3.316s 29 360 KB 3.509s 30 369 KB $----
Repeat View 1.055s 0.502s 1.030s 1133 1635 1.055s 1 38 KB 1.055s 1 38 KB
Waterfall Screen Shot
First View
(3.316s)
Repeat View
(1.055s)
Content Breakdown
Requests
html
js
css
image
other
72.4%
Content Type Requests
html 1
js 4
css 2
image 21
flash 0
font 0
other 1
Bytes
html
js
css
image
other
45.9%
48.3%
Content Type Bytes
html 13906
js 165815
css 6687
image 174614
flash 0
font 0
other 569
Well, I don't much know what this all means, but if it helps, here it is. That didn't copy very well. Is it useable?
Web Page Performance Test for
http://www.wanderlodgegurus.com
From: Miami, FL - Chrome - Cable
4/8/2015, 10:57:30 PM
Summary
DetailsPerformance ReviewContent BreakdownDomainsScreen Shot
Tester: ROUTERCON6-73.204.184.197
Raw page data - Raw object data
Export HTTP Archive (.har)
See in ShowSlow
View Test Log
Document Complete Fully Loaded
Load Time First Byte Start Render Speed Index DOM Elements Time Requests Bytes In Time Requests Bytes In Cost
First View 3.316s 0.690s 3.328s 3343 1635 3.316s 29 360 KB 3.509s 30 369 KB $----
Repeat View 1.055s 0.502s 1.030s 1133 1635 1.055s 1 38 KB 1.055s 1 38 KB
Waterfall Screen Shot
First View
(3.316s)
Repeat View
(1.055s)
Content Breakdown
Requests
html
js
css
image
other
72.4%
Content Type Requests
html 1
js 4
css 2
image 21
flash 0
font 0
other 1
Bytes
html
js
css
image
other
45.9%
48.3%
Content Type Bytes
html 13906
js 165815
css 6687
image 174614
flash 0
font 0
other 569
04-09-2015, 11:49
David, this is fast. Do you need 401's for redirecting established google link http to https ?
04-09-2015, 12:49
(04-08-2015 23:52)rrueckwald Wrote: [ -> ]Well, I don't much know what this all means, but if it helps, here it is. That didn't copy very well. Is it useable?
Load Time First Byte Start Render Speed Index DOM Elements Time Requests Bytes In Time Requests Bytes In Cost
First View 3.316s 0.690s 3.328s 3343 1635 3.316s 29 360 KB 3.509s 30 369 KB $----
Repeat View 1.055s 0.502s 1.030s 1133 1635 1.055s 1 38 KB 1.055s 1 38 KB
Thanks Ron, yes it is useable. The "first byte" delays look reasonable at 0.690s and 0.502s which tells me you're not having a connectivity issue at least for this test. I'd be very interested in seeing a webpagetest result for one of your 30s thread reading delays.
(04-09-2015 11:49)GregOConnor Wrote: [ -> ]David, this is fast. Do you need 401's for redirecting established google link http to https ?
Hi Greg, I think I'm set for the time being. MyBB requires redirects to be placed in the .htaccess file. Currently I'm using a 301 response which means a "permanent" redirect to the https url. My .htaccess file is pretty complex because of all the google seo crap in it. I have no choice but to do redirects at this level.
All I really want from the SSL Certificate is the static IP address. Actually using https is optional and experimental. It's a little messy because there are links that I bring in on various pages that aren't https so on occasion you may see a "security.mixed_content.block_active_content" error message. If anyone sees this let me know and I'll either restore things to http or tell you how to modify settings in your browsers to ignore these messages and continue loading content. An example of where you might see this error is when you navigate over to the "User Locations" toplink which sucks in a bunch of non-secure google mapping stuff.
BTW, don't let all this highfalutin language lead you into falsely believing that I know what I'm talking about... Thanks everyone for helping out; I often don't know that we have performance problems unless someone tells me.
04-10-2015, 12:03
Looks like some folks are still having some performance issues. Don't be bashful about speaking up. If you have the time a screen shot of test results from http://www.webpagetest.org will help me isolate the problem. I usually enter wanderlodgegurus.com and then take a screen capture of the results using Microsoft's snippet tool under Microsoft/Accessories in your Start menu. Like so: [attachment=1606]
Thanks, together we'll get to the bottom of this.
Thanks, together we'll get to the bottom of this.
04-10-2015, 13:31
Document Complete
Fully Loaded
Load Time
First Byte
Start Render
Speed Index
DOM Elements
Time
Requests
Bytes In
Time
Requests
Bytes In
Cost
First View 1.929s 0.674s 1.590s 1617 1633 1.929s 32 279 KB 2.113s 32 288 KB $----
Repeat View 1.021s 0.504s 0.894s 958 1632 1.021s 1 38 KB 1.021s 1 38 KB
Fully Loaded
Load Time
First Byte
Start Render
Speed Index
DOM Elements
Time
Requests
Bytes In
Time
Requests
Bytes In
Cost
First View 1.929s 0.674s 1.590s 1617 1633 1.929s 32 279 KB 2.113s 32 288 KB $----
Repeat View 1.021s 0.504s 0.894s 958 1632 1.021s 1 38 KB 1.021s 1 38 KB
04-10-2015, 15:24